|
CURIOUS
TIMES:
Post 9/11 a sensual libertarian movement with a distinctively
feminine voice, emanating from
Brooklyn and the
Lower East Side, driven by a cadre of women (female social
entrepreneurs, erotic event planners and sensual performance artiste's,
a "sensual libertarian network" of sorts) has ascended upon, transformed
and otherwise become part of the essential fabric of Manhattan
nightlife, society and culture. Whether it is the art mimicking our
culture or the art itself an outgrowth of the cultural and political
climate is not so clear. Perhaps it was a little of both. This "sensual
movement" celebrating girl power and girl love embodies the choice
rather than exploitation of women. It is also on some level leading our
society towards a healthy erosion of double standards by creating
a forum for women to celebrate their sexual freedom, pleasure and status
as sexual beings. It is not simply about nudity, sex or hedonistic
indulgence, although there is plenty of that. As stated by,
Palagia of
Onelegupnyc in reference to her erotic themed events, "It would be
nice [if the media] would hone in on how these events transform
relationships or marriages." "I'd rather read about how a couple grew
from attending one of my parties versus where they had sex and with
whom."
The undercurrent seems pragmatic, reality & choice based rather than a
morality play with a clientele that was more
Eyes Wide Shut than
Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice, without the moral dilemmas which perplexed
Tom and Nicole in
Eyes Wide Shut, although
Gregos Loft Parties eventually
came to an end
when Grego found religion and no longer the fulfillment he
sought in this lifestyle. See also:
Let-It-All-Hang
Out; The Politics of Sensuality;
Soft Core in The Big Apple ;
New Hedonists
SEX SCANDALS:
Consensual Sex Work vs. Victims of Human Trafficking
Fast forward a few
years later and we find a focus on Sex Scandals, harassment, raids and
arrests on high end escorts and madams. Upon closer examination, in
retrospect, one has to wonder whether this was part of an intelligence
gathering effort by the intelligence community in the United States. While in
some cases it may involve the local police, the directive goes straight
up to the federal level at the FBI, IRS. It is important that we not
demonize local law enforcement for merely following orders and enforcing
the law as it exists. Police men and women, like teachers and other
municipal workers, enforce the law and operate at pleasure and the
directive of a higher authority. Police men and women are people like
you and me, who if they do not follow order risk their livelihood.
Notably, however, Eliot Spitzer's private affairs may not have gained
public exposure if he
intelligence community was not on a heightened level of alert for
suspect activity post 9/11.
Consider first that high end sex workers, most often are not victims of
human trafficking
but rather work consensually. Whether they operate independently or
through their brokers or agents, most often they cater to and service an elite,
upscale and affluent clientele. As a result of the intimacy of their
conduct and often strict verification procedures, certain folks usually
come into possession of the dirty secrets and personal
information of some of the most affluent, successful,
powerful and influential people in society. High end sex workers
separate and apart from victims of
human trafficking, work of their own
free will and volition. Sex Traffickers pose much more difficult targets
for local, national and international law enforcement.
Crusades against escorts and madams operating at the upper echelons of
American Society have little or nothing to do with preserving the safety
and security of women or cracking down on
human trafficking, even if
they give the appearance of such. It is but an illusion and deception
perpetrated on the American public. In short, Sex Scandals and busts of
prostitutes of this kind are never really about what they claim to be.
By targeting the low hanging fruit so to speak, the Police State gets to
go on a fishing expedition, gathering information about the affluent,
powerful and influential for use at a later time. Material gathered
might be of use at a later time to persuade, cajole and perhaps even
blackmail influential people who might otherwise be unwilling to play
ball and cooperate with an overall agenda which might be against theirs
or society’s interests.
LEGALIZATION OF PROSTITUTION?--Guide to Utilization of Sex Workers &
Avoiding Victims of Human Trafficking
In my opinion,
legalization of prostitution, at least in the manner that it has been
discussed is not necessarily the answer. Government
involvement is unnecessary in consensual transactional romantic
encounters, whether they involve companionship or even sex. Government
efforts
should focus its efforts instead, nationally and
internationally, on breaking up and prosecuting
human trafficking rings
and not high end escort services, madams or independent escorts who are
often models, actresses and students who choose this activity as a means
to supplement their income. Patrons of sex workers should likewise
consider hiring only women who work independently, with reputable
escort services or agents, brokers or madams that compensate women fairly allowing them to
keep a majority of their earnings minus a brokerage fee for their
networking the transaction. Once we recognize and accept that in a free
market system that transactional romantic encounters are inevitable,
they ought to be decriminalized and the right for parties to contract
privately be respected. Consumers should be educated about the proper
etiquette in the utilization of sex workers and the avoidance of
patronizing prostitutes enslaved via
human trafficking. One should do
all that is possible to hire women who speak the native language, appear
independent, secure, clean and do not otherwise appear to be the victims
of human trafficking. This should be relatively easy for most reasonable
people to determine even in the absence of a guide.
As
we look back from the position of December 2008, with the American
economy in crisis from the
sub prime mortgage meltdown, the
financial industry bailout and then the subsequent exposure of
Bernie Madoff’s $50 Billion Scam one has to wonder who and what end
was served by Governor Eliot Spitzer’s removal from office.
The series of arrests of escorts and madams leading ultimately to the
former
New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's doorstep seem at somewhat curious
if not suspect. Was
Eliot Spitzer targeted by powerful forces in our society?
Discrediting
The Sheriff Of Wall Street was one way to disarm their greatest
critic but could it have also been an effort to thwart more significant
exposure and to control the economic fallout that may have impacted some
prominent people and institutions in a profound way? Consider the recent
headline on
The Huffington Post leading to a story on Bloomberg:
FBI AGENT: FINANCIAL CRIMES NOW POSE 'THE GREATEST THREAT' Turns
out that Eliot Spitzer was right all along. Imagine the Eliot Spitzer’s
political position today without his private contractual transactions
with a high end sex worker.
Spitzer was elected
by a substantial margin with the support of
69% of New York voters on Election Day in 2006,
a truth crusader who was not beholden to anyone but the voters, one who
scared the hell out of some of the most deeply corrupt in the financial
and business community. In many ways, Spitzer was like a
bull in a china shop. Society can handle political crusaders who use flamboyant and
challenging language in a campaign but who once elected lapse into a
more cooperative working tone with society’s power brokers. Eliot
Spitzer’s strength was in fact his greatest weakness.
Eliot Spitzer was screwed largely because power feared
him and
did not trust that Spitzer would act diplomatically. In removing Spitzer, an element of the
status quo was kept in place and perhaps some deeply corrupt people get to hold
on to their bounty. Contrast that with the tenure of Bush & Cheney, what
has been done to the Constitution, the Justice Department, the Nation’s
Treasury, their conduct of the War overseas. While they were allowed to
complete their
time in office worth hundreds of millions more than when they came in
and that Eliot Spitzer, who was right about Wall Street, had to resign
because he paid a high end call girl for private contractual sexual
encounters, if nothing else is clear, some believe that there was a second
coup d’état in the time period of 2000-2008. |